socofpowerСоциология властиSociology of Power2074-04922413-144XThe Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationVBRPBSsocofpower-277Research ArticleПЕРЕВОДЫTRANSLATIONSКризисы, изменения и трансформацииCrises, Changes, and Transformationshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1674-9310КозловС. В.KozlovS. V.

Козлов Степан Викторович — MA in Sociology, аспирант ИОН РАНХиГС; преподаватель факультета социальных наук МВШСЭН, руководитель Лаборатории исследований социальных изменений Шанинки (ЛИСИ).

Москва

Stepan V. Kozlov — MA in Sociology, graduate student at ISS RANEPA; lecturer of the Social Sciences department of MSSES, head of Laboratory of Social Change Research of Shaninka (LSCR).

Moscow

ste.kozlov@gmail.comРоссийская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы; Московская Высшая школа социальных и экономических наукРоссияRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Moscow School of Social and Economic SciencesRussian Federation202527072025372207213Copyright © Козлов С.В., 20252025Козлов С.В.Kozlov S.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://socofpower.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/277

.

ReferencesБикбов А. (2014). Грамматика порядка: Историческая социология понятий, которые меняют нашу реальность. М.: Издательство Высшей школы экономики. EDN: VXAOKLBikbov A. (2014). Grammar of Order: A Historical Sociology of Concepts That Change Our Reality. Moscow: HSE Publishing. (in Russ.)Бурдье П. (2001). Практический смысл. СПб.: Алетейя. EDN: QOGTMHBourdieu P. (2001). Practical meaning. St. Petersburg: Aleteya. (in Russ.)Бурдье П. (2018). Homo Academicus. М.: Издательство Института Гайдара. EDN: HDSZPDBourdieu P. (2018). Homo Academicus. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gaydara. (in Russ.)Alexander J. C. (1995). Fin de siècle social theory: Relativism, reduction, and the problem of reason. London; New York: Verso.Alexander J. C. (1995). Fin de siècle social theory: Relativism, reduction, and the problem of reason. London; New York: Verso.Alexander J. C. (2018). The societalization of social problems: Church pedophilia, phone hacking, and the financial crisis. American Sociological Review, 83(6), pp. 1049–1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418803376Alexander J. C. (2018). The societalization of social problems: Church pedophilia, phone hacking, and the financial crisis. American Sociological Review, 83(6), pp. 1049–1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418803376Arnholtz J. (2018). Tensions, actors, and inventions: Bourdieu’s sociology of the state as an unfinished but promising research program. In T. Medvetz & J. J. Sallaz (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 576–600). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199357192.013.27Arnholtz J. (2018). Tensions, actors, and inventions: Bourdieu’s sociology of the state as an unfinished but promising research program. In T. Medvetz & J. J. Sallaz (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 576–600). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199357192.013.27Bourdieu P. (1962). The Algerians. Boston: Beacon Press.Bourdieu P. (1962). The Algerians. Boston: Beacon Press.Bourdieu P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Bourdieu P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Bourdieu P. (2022). Microcosmes: Théories des champs. Paris: Raisons d’agir.Bourdieu P. (2022). Microcosmes: Théories des champs. Paris: Raisons d’agir.Gorski P. S. (2013). Bourdieu as a theorist of change. In P. S. Gorski (Ed.), Bourdieu and historical analysis (pp. 1–15).Gorski P. S. (2013). Bourdieu as a theorist of change. In P. S. Gorski (Ed.), Bourdieu and historical analysis (pp. 1–15).Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395430-001Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395430-001Mahar C. (1990). Pierre Bourdieu: The intellectual project. In R. Harker, C. Mahar, & C. Wilkes (Eds.), An introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 26–57). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21134-0_2Mahar C. (1990). Pierre Bourdieu: The intellectual project. In R. Harker, C. Mahar, & C. Wilkes (Eds.), An introduction to the work of Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 26–57). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21134-0_2Marom N. (2014). Relating a city’s history and geography with Bourdieu: One hundred years of spatial distinction in Tel Aviv. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), pp. 1344–1362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12027Marom N. (2014). Relating a city’s history and geography with Bourdieu: One hundred years of spatial distinction in Tel Aviv. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), pp. 1344–1362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12027Sapiro G. (2014). The French writers’ war, 1940–1953. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822395126Sapiro G. (2014). The French writers’ war, 1940–1953. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822395126Sapiro G. (2021). Against self-interest: The codification of „disinterestedness” as an axiological operator in religion, aesthetics, and the ethics of intellectual professions. In C. Zabel (Ed.), Historicizing self-interest in the modern Atlantic world: A plea for ego? (pp. 256–274). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022749-15Sapiro G. (2021). Against self-interest: The codification of „disinterestedness” as an axiological operator in religion, aesthetics, and the ethics of intellectual professions. In C. Zabel (Ed.), Historicizing self-interest in the modern Atlantic world: A plea for ego? (pp. 256–274). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022749-15Steinmetz G. (2011). Bourdieu, historicity, and historical sociology. Cultural Sociology, 5(1), pp. 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975510389912Steinmetz G. (2011). Bourdieu, historicity, and historical sociology. Cultural Sociology, 5(1), pp. 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975510389912

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.