<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">socofpower</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Социология власти</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Sociology of Power</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2074-0492</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2413-144X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-73-86</article-id><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">GXDDST</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">socofpower-237</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>«Прекрасный новый нейронаучный мир»: история будущего психиатрии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Brave New Neuroscientific World: The History of the Future of Psychiatry</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3269-8488</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бардина</surname><given-names>Светлана М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Bardina</surname><given-names>Svetlana M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат философских наук, доцент кафедры социологии и старший научный сотрудник Международного центра современной социологической теории МВШСЭН, старший научныйсотрудник Центра социологических исследований РАНХиГС</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD (Candidate of Science in Philosophy), associateprofessor and senior research fellow of the International Center for Contemporary Social Theory, MSSES, senior research fellow of the Center for Sociological Research, RANEPA.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">neology@bk.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Московская высшая школа социальных и экономических наук, Россия<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">MSSES, Moscow, Russia<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>07</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>86</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Бардина С.М., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Бардина С.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bardina S.M.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://socofpower.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/237">https://socofpower.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/237</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматривается модель нейроповорота в психиатрии, представленная в работах Николаса Роуза. Идея, что достижения в области нейронаук кардинальным образом повлияли на психиатрию, а также смогут существенно переопределить развитие дисциплины в будущем, стала общепринятой. Вне зависимости от оценки этих изменений исследователи сходятся в том, что это воздействие приводит к созданию принципиально нового способа понимания и лечения психических расстройств. Модель Роуза примечательна тем, что в фокусе ее внимания находятся не только сами изменения, произошедшие и происходящие в психиатрии, но и то, как строится разговор об этих изменениях. Предметом анализа в этой модели выступают в том числе надежды, ожидания, оценки произошедших и грядущих изменений в области психиатрии. В статье реконструируется логика, согласно которой сама идея радикального нейроповорота относится к будущему, но влияет на развитие психиатрии сегодня. Далее в статье демонстрируется парадокс, связанный с противоречивостью использования категории будущего. С одной стороны, развитие психиатрии последних десятилетий определяется образом просчитываемого, прогнозируемого и поэтому управляемого будущего в сфере психического здоровья и психической жизни в целом. С другой стороны, предполагаемый радикальный поворот внутри дисциплины не может быть полностью описан и предсказан из перспективы сегодняшнего дня, поскольку он должен привести к возникновению принципиально иной реальности. Однако именно этот поворот делает возможным предсказуемое будущее. Этот парадокс сопровождает современную дискуссию о возможности нейроповорота в психиатрии и во многом определяет настоящее дисциплины.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The paper examines Nikolas Rose's conception of the neuroscientific revolution in psychiatry. It has been repeatedly stated that the advances in neuroscience led to the radical transformation of psychiatry and that they will lead to further changes in mental health. Regardless of whether this transformation is considered as change for the better or for the worse, it is described as a radical move towards a completely new way of understanding and treating mental disorders. Rose's conception is remarkable since it focuses not only on the very transformation of psychiatry, but also on the discourse of radical shift, on hopes, expectations and evaluations of these changes. This paper examines and summarizes key ideas of how the discourse of radical shift - which in fact refers to the future - influences the way psychiatry evolves. The author demonstrates that this discourse is controversial, since it is based on an ambivalent concept of the future. On the one hand, the neuroscientific revolution in psychiatry is said to establish a predictable, calculable and thus governable future in the field of mental health. On the other hand, the expected radical revolution in methods of treating and preventing mental disorders is considered as inconceivable from today's perspective. Yet, the latter is the condition of the former. This paradox forms an integral part of recent discussions on the neuroscientific revolution in psychiatry.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>будущее</kwd><kwd>нейроповорот в  психиатрии</kwd><kwd>психиатрия</kwd><kwd>психофармакологическая революция</kwd><kwd>Роуз</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>future</kwd><kwd>neuroscientific revolution</kwd><kwd>psychiatry</kwd><kwd>psychopharmacological revolution</kwd><kwd>Rose</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Власова О.А. (2014) Антипсихиатрия. Социальная теория и социальная практика, М.:</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Braslow J., Meldrum M.L., Selya R. The Creation of Neuroscience: The Society for</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">ИД ВШЭ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Neuroscience and the Quest for Disciplinary Unity, 1969-1995, Washington: Society for</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vlasova O.A. (2014) Anti-psychiatry: Social Theory and Social Practice,M.: HSE Publishing</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Neuroscience.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">House.—in Russ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Casper S.T. (2014) Nikolas Rose and Joelle M. Abi-Rached. Neuro: The New Brain</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Михель Д.В. (2019) Биокапитализм: новые технологии, новая экономика, новые</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sciences and theManagement of the Mind. Book Review. Journal of the History of the</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">формы труда и контроля в глобальном мире. Реферативный журнал. Социальные</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Behavioral Sciences, 51(1): 95-98.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Серия 9. Востоковедение и африканистика, 4: 25-49.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Charney D.S., Barlow D.H., Botteron K. et al. (2002) Neuroscience research agenda to</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mikhel D.V. (2019) Biocapitalism: Breakthrough Technologies, New Economy, New</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">guide development of a pathophysiologically based classification system. D.J. Kupfer,</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Varieties of Labor and Control. Social and Human Sciences. Domestic and foreign literature.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">M.B. First, D.A. Regier (eds) A research agenda for DSM-V, Washington, DC: American</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Series 9. Oriental and African Studies, 4: 25-49.—in Russ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Psychiatric Association: 31-84.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фуко М. (1998) Рождение клиники,М.: Смысл.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coulter J. (1973) Approaches to Insanity. A Philosophical &amp; Sociological Study,New York:</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Foucault M. (1998) The Birth of the Clinic,M.: Smysl.—in Russ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">John Wiley.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Healy D. (1987) The structure of psychopharmacological revolutions. Psychiatric</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Healy D. (1987) The structure of psychopharmacological revolutions. Psychiatric</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Development, 4: 349-376.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Development, 4: 349-376.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hyman S.E. (2012) Revolution stalled. Science Translational Medicine, 4: 1-5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hyman S.E. (2012) Revolution stalled. Science Translational Medicine, 4: 1-5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kendell R.E. (1975) The role of diagnosis in psychiatry, Oxford: Blackwell.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kendell R.E. (1975) The role of diagnosis in psychiatry, Oxford: Blackwell.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lakoff A. (2005) Pharmaceutical Reason: Knowledge and Value in Global Psychiatry,</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakoff A. (2005) Pharmaceutical Reason: Knowledge and Value in Global Psychiatry,</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lewis B. (2006) Moving Beyond Prozac, DSM, &amp; the New Psychiatry, Michigan: The</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lewis B. (2006) Moving Beyond Prozac, DSM, &amp; the New Psychiatry, Michigan: The</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">University of Michigan Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">University of Michigan Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Peele S. (2011) The Psychiatric Revolution Is Over. Psychology Today (https://www.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Peele S. (2011) The Psychiatric Revolution Is Over. Psychology Today (https://www.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">psychologytoday.com/us/blog/addiction-in-society/201106/the-psychiatricrevolution-is-over)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">psychologytoday.com/us/blog/addiction-in-society/201106/the-psychiatricrevolution-is-over)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reynolds C., Lewis D., Detre T., Schatzberg A., Kupfer D. (2009) The Future of</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reynolds C., Lewis D., Detre T., Schatzberg A., Kupfer D. (2009) The Future of</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Psychiatry as Clinical Neuroscience. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Psychiatry as Clinical Neuroscience. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">American Medical Colleges, 84: 446-450.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">American Medical Colleges, 84: 446-450.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rose N. (2003a) Neurochemical selves. Society, 41 (1): 46-59.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose N. (2003a) Neurochemical selves. Society, 41 (1): 46-59.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rose N. (2003b) The neurochemical self and its anomalies. R.V. Ericson, A. Doyle (eds)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose N. (2003b) The neurochemical self and its anomalies. R.V. Ericson, A. Doyle (eds)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Risk and morality, Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 407-437.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Risk and morality, Toronto: University of Toronto Press: 407-437.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rose N. (2007) The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twentyfirst century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose N. (2007) The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twentyfirst century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rose N. (2016) Neuroscience and the future for mental health? Epidemiology and</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose N. (2016) Neuroscience and the future for mental health? Epidemiology and</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Psychiatric Sciences, 25: 95-100.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Psychiatric Sciences, 25: 95-100.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rose N. (2019) Our Psychiatric Future: The Politics of Mental Health, Cambridge: Polity</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose N. (2019) Our Psychiatric Future: The Politics of Mental Health, Cambridge: Polity</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rose N., Abi-Rached J.M. (2013) Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rose N., Abi-Rached J.M. (2013) Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mind, Princeton: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mind, Princeton: Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rosenhan D.L. (1973) On Being Sane in Insane Places. Science, New Series, 179(4070):</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rosenhan D.L. (1973) On Being Sane in Insane Places. Science, New Series, 179(4070):</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">-258.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">-258.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Scheff T. (1999) Being Mentally Ill: A Sociological Theory, New York: Aldine de</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scheff T. (1999) Being Mentally Ill: A Sociological Theory, New York: Aldine de</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gruyter.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gruyter.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vidal F. (2009) Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vidal F. (2009) Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sciences, 22 (1):5-36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sciences, 22 (1):5-36.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
