<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">socofpower</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Социология власти</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Sociology of Power</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2074-0492</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2413-144X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">0000-0002-8344-6846</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">socofpower-159</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Тайна формы самой по себе: возвращение проблемы стоимости</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Mystery of the Form Itself: the Return of the Value Problem</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8344-6846</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Квачев</surname><given-names>Вадим Г.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kvachev</surname><given-names>Vadim G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доцент Российского экономического университета им. Г.В. Плеханова</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">kvachevvg@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-1"><institution>Российский экономический университет им. Г.В. Плеханова</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>07</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title>Капитализм в XXI веке</issue-title><fpage>103</fpage><lpage>124</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Квачев В.Г., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Квачев В.Г.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kvachev V.G.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://socofpower.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/159">https://socofpower.ranepa.ru/jour/article/view/159</self-uri><abstract><p>Теория стоимости является одним из фундаментальных вопросов политической экономии, она закладывает самые основы ее функционирования. То или иное представление о стоимости радикальным образом влияет как на исследовательскую программу, так и на политические представления экономистов и социальных теоретиков. Сегодня вопрос о стоимости считается решенным, по крайней мере в рамках экономического мейнстрима. Иногда он считается просто несущественным или находящимся за пределами поля исследования «настоящей» науки. Но не является ли само стремление оставить этот вопрос нерешенным (отказаться от рассмотрения теории стоимости вообще) или найти ему временное решение (заниматься вопросами цен вместо вопроса о стоимости) свидетельством того, что мы имеем дело с эпистемологическим препятствием, сама сложность которого отражает некоторые противоречия капитализма? Вопрос о стоимости не только экономический, его следует рассматривать через призму методологии, которую сегодня называют междисциплинарной. Но, прежде всего, это вопрос социально-философский в широком смысле этого слова. Возвращение к вопросу о стоимости позволит по-новому взглянуть на «тайну формы самой по себе», товарной формы, являвшейся центральным объектом рассмотрения политической экономии Маркса. Сегодня вопрос о стоимости по-прежнему остается нерешенным. Настоящая статья призывает отказаться как от эссенциалистского понимания теории стоимости, существовавшего в ортодоксальном марксизме, и скорее понимать стоимость как политическую проблему. Капиталистическая форма стоимости связана с производством основополагающих конфликтов современной социальной системы, и ключ к пониманию этих конфликтов лежит именно в понимании, как функционирует понятие стоимости. Настоящая статья предлагает снова поставить вопрос о стоимости в качестве социально-философского основания критики современного капитализма.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The theory of value is one of the fundamental topics of political economy;it lays the very foundation for its functioning. The theory of value radically affects both the research program and the political views of economists and social theorists. Today, the question of value is considered tobe settled, at least within the economic mainstream. Sometimes it isconsidered simply irrelevant or outside the field of study of "real" science. But the very desire to leave this question unresolved (to abandonthe consideration of the theory of value in general) or to find a temporarysolution for it (to deal with the issues of price instead of the issue of value)represents evidence that we are dealing with an epistemological obstacle,the very complexity of which reflects some of the contradictions of capitalism. The issue of value is not only a matter of economics; it should beviewed through an interdisciplinary perspective. But, first of all, it is asocio-philosophical question in the broadest sense of the word. Returningto the question of value will allow us to take a fresh look at the "mysteryof the form in itself", the commodity form, which was the central objectof consideration of the political economy of Marx. This article proposes tore-raise the question of value as a socio-philosophical basis for a criticismof modern capitalism.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>стоимость</kwd><kwd>трудовая теория стоимости</kwd><kwd>марксизм</kwd><kwd>капитал</kwd><kwd>власть</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>value</kwd><kwd>labour theory of value</kwd><kwd>Marxism</kwd><kwd>capital</kwd><kwd>power</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Визер Ф. (1992 [1914]) Теория общественного хозяйства (избр. гл.). Австрийская школа в политической экономии: К. Менгер, Е. Бём-Баверк, Ф. Визер. Пер. с нем., предисл., коммент., сост. В.С.Автономова, М.: Экономика.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">—Wieser F. (1992 [1914]) The theory of social economy (selected chap.). Austrian School in Political Economy: K. Menger, E. Boehm-Bawerk, F. Wieser. Trans. From German, foreword, commentary, comp. V.S. Avtonomova, M.: Economics. — in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вирно П. (2013) Грамматика множества: к анализу форм современной жизни, М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">—Virno P. (2013) A Grammar of the Multitude: For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life, Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. — in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дардо П., Лаваль К. (2011) Неолиберализм и капиталистическая субъективация. Логос, 80 (1): 103-117. EDN: RKKUAO</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">—Dardot P., Laval C. (2011) Neoliberalism and capitalist subjectivation. Logos, 80 (1): 103-117. — in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жижек С. (1999) Возвышенный объект идеологии, М.: Художественный журнал.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">— Žižek S. (1999) Sublime object of ideology, Moscow: Khudozhestvennyj zhurnal. — in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жижек С. (2004) Ирак: история про чайник. М.: Издательская группа "Праксис".</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">—Žižek S. (2004) Iraq: a story about a teapot. Moscow: Praxis Publishing Group.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маршалл А. (1984) Принципы политической экономии, М.: Прогресс.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">—Marshall A. (1984) Principles of Political Economy, M.: Progress. — in Russ</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мейсон П. (2016) Посткапитализм. Путеводитель по нашему будущему, М.: Ад Маргинем.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">— Mason P. (2016) Post-capitalism. Guide to our future, M.: Ad Marginem. —in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Менгер К. (2005) Избранные работы, М.: Территория будущего.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">—Menger K. (2005) Selected works, M.: Territory of the future. — in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пашуканис Е.Б. (1929) Общая теория права и марксизм, М.: Коммунистическая Академия. (http://kritikaprava.org/library/31/obschaya_teoriya_prava_i_marksizm).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">—Pashukanis E.B. (1929) General theory of law and Marxism, Moscow: Communist Academy. (http://kritikaprava.org/library/31/obschaya_teoriya_prava_i_marksizm) — in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рубин И. (1929) Очерки по теории стоимости Маркса, М.: Государственное издательство. (https://zarya.xyz/ocherki-po-teorii-stoimosti-marksa/ 21).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">— Rubin I. (1929) Essays on the theory of value by Marx, Moscow: State Publishing House. (https://zarya.xyz/ocherki-po-teorii-stoimosti-marksa/ 21) — in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Самуэльсон П. (1993) Экономика, М.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">—Samuelson P. (1993) Economics, M. — in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сергеев А.А. (1977) Стоимость. Большая советская энциклопедия. T.24. Часть 3. М.: Советская энциклопедия: 2493.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">— Sergeev A.A. (1977) Value. Great Soviet Encyclopedia. T.24. Part 3. M.: Soviet encyclopedia: 2493. — in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фуко М. (2010) Рождение биополитики. Курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1978-1979 учебном году, М.: Наука. EDN: WBSBVV</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">—Foucault M. (2010) The Birth of Biopolitics. A course of lectures given at the College de France in the 1978-1979 academic year, M.: Science. — in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хоркхаймер М., Адорно Т. (1997) Диалектика просвещения: философские фрагменты, М.; СПб.: Медиум, Ювента.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">— Horkheimer M., Adorno T. (1997) Dialectics of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, M.; SPb .: Medium, Juventa. — in Russ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blaug M. (1992) The methodology of economics, or, How economists explain, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blaug M. (1992) The methodology of economics, or, How economists explain, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bonefeld W. (2010) Abstract labour: Against its nature and on its time. Capital &amp; Class, 34 (2).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bonefeld W. (2010) Abstract labour: Against its nature and on its time. Capital &amp; Class, 34 (2).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Elson D. (1979) The value theory of labour. The Representation of Labour in Capitalism, London: CSE Books.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Elson D. (1979) The value theory of labour. The Representation of Labour in Capitalism, London: CSE Books.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jevons W.S. (1911) The Theory of Political Economy. (https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/jevons/TheoryPoliticalEconomy.pdf ).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jevons W.S. (1911) The Theory of Political Economy. (https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/jevons/TheoryPoliticalEconomy.pdf )</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kerr D. (1994) Trial by space. Common Sense, 15: 18-35.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kerr D. (1994) Trial by space. Common Sense, 15: 18-35.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kvachev V. (2020) Unflat Ontology: Essay on the Poverty of Democratic Materialism. Stasis, 9 (1). EDN: BYCQPB</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kvachev V. (2020) Unflat Ontology: Essay on the Poverty of Democratic Materialism. Stasis, 9 (1).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lefebvre H. (2009) Dialectical Materialism. Minnesota: The University of Minnesota Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lefebvre H. (2009) Dialectical Materialism. Minnesota: The University of Minnesota Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Marx K. (1890) Das Kapital. Vol. I. (https://content.csbs.utah.edu/~ehrbar/cap1.pdf). Minsky H.P. (2008 [1986]) Stabilizing the Unstable Economу. New Haven: Yale University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K. (1890) Das Kapital. Vol. I. (https://content.csbs.utah.edu/~ehrbar/cap1.pdf ).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mises L. von (1957) Psychology and Thymology. London: Theory and History: 272. Nitzan J., Bichker Sh. (2009) Capital as Power, N.Y.: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Minsky H.P. (2008 [1986]) Stabilizing the Unstable Economу. New Haven: Yale University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">O'Kane C. (2020) The Critique of Real Abstraction: from the Critical Theory of Society to the Critique of Political Economy and Back Again. Marx and Contemporary Critical Theory. New York: Springer.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mises L. von (1957) Psychology and Thymology. London: Theory and History: 272.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Postone M. (2003) Time, labor, and social domination: A reinterpretation of Marx's critical theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nitzan J., Bichker Sh. (2009) Capital as Power, N.Y.: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pranama ECO (2020) Веб-сайт. (https://pranamateco.ru/).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O’Kane C. (2020) The Critique of Real Abstraction: from the Critical Theory of Society to the Critique of Political Economy and Back Again. Marx and Contemporary Critical Theory. New York: Springer.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reichelt H. (2005) Social Reality as Appearance: Some Notes on Marx's Conception of Reality. Human Dignity, Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Postone M. (2003) Time, labor, and social domination: A reinterpretation of Marx’s critical theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson J. (1974) Economic Philosoph, Suffolk: Pelican Books.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pranama ECO (2020) Веб-сайт. (https://pranamateco.ru/)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sohn-Rethel A. (1978) Intellectual And Manual Labour: A Critique Of Epistemology. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reichelt H. (2005) Social Reality as Appearance: Some Notes on Marx’s Conception of Reality. Human Dignity, Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harvey D. (2018) Marx's Refusal of the Labour Theory of Value. (http://davidharvey.org/2018/03/marxs-refusal-of-the-labour-theory-of-value-by-david-harvey/).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson J. (1974) Economic Philosoph, Suffolk: Pelican Books.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zizek S (2012) Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sohn-Rethel A. (1978) Intellectual And Manual Labour: A Critique Of Epistemology. Atlantic</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Toscano A. (2008) The Open Secret of Real Abstraction. Rethinking Marxism. A Journal of Economics, Culture &amp; Society, 20 (2): 273-287.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Toscano A. (2008) The Open Secret of Real Abstraction. Rethinking Marxism. A Journal of Economics, Culture &amp; Society, 20 (2): 273-287.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harvey D. (2018) Marx’s Refusal of the Labour Theory of Value. (http://davidharvey.org/2018/03/marxs-refusal-of-the-labour-theory-of-value-by-david-harvey/)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harvey D. (2018) Marx’s Refusal of the Labour Theory of Value. (http://davidharvey.org/2018/03/marxs-refusal-of-the-labour-theory-of-value-by-david-harvey/)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zizek S (2012) Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zizek S (2012) Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
